Course Overview:
This course examines the ways college disciplinary systems--including
academic integrity policies--can be used to promote student ethical
development. Special attention will be paid to:
- defining the aims of ethical development programming at public and
private institutions of higher education;
- exploring how ethics can be taught;
- considering how conduct codes and academic integrity policies can be
designed to promote student ethical development;
- highlighting the special role of honor codes and the new honor code
movement in fostering student ethical development;
- exploring the role of students in influencing and educating their
peers;
- examining ways students, faculty members, and administrators can work
together in designing and using the disciplinary process to promote
student ethical development;
- designing sanctions and related training programs designed to promote
student ethical development.
Course Outline:
The course is divided into three modules, concluding with a list of
"best practices" on how to use the disciplinary process to promote
student ethical development. The first module focuses on what "ethical
development" means--what knowledge, skills, insights, and habits we want
students to acquire--and how they might be taught. The second module
explores how campus disciplinary codes can be designed and administered
to promote ethical dialogue and student ethical development. The third
module examines the "new honor code" movement, and how honor systems can
enlist substantial student participation in ethical development
programming.
Learning Outcomes:
Active participants in the course will have a better understanding of:
- what "ethical development" means and how and why it should be taught;
- the aims of the campus disciplinary process;
- how disciplinary codes and procedures can be designed to promote
student ethical development;
- How the "new honor code" movement arose and what it has accomplished;
- The role of students, administrators and faculty members in designing
and administering campus disciplinary systems and ethical development
programs
- the likely direction of college ethical development programs in the
years ahead.
Participant Expectations:
Participants will be expected to devote approximately fifteen hours to
the course (five hours for each of the three week modules). Assignments
include selected readings and regular discussions. Active participation
in online discussions will enhance learning outcomes. At the close of
the course each participant will be asked to submit a short list of at
least three best practices" in ways to design and use the college
disciplinary process to promote student ethical development.
Individuals registering for CEUs will receive 1.0 CEU upon successful
completion of the course.
Instructor Bios:
Gary Pavela, is Director of Judicial Programs at the University of Maryland-College
Park, and edits the national quarterly Synthesis: Law and Policy in Higher Education
as well as its sister publication, Synfax Weekly Report-- publications to which over
1,000 colleges and universities in the United States and Canada subscribe.
He holds an M.A. in intellectual history from Wesleyan University, a law degree from
the University of Illinois, and has been a Fellow at the University of Wisconsin
Center for Behavioral Science and Law.
Pavela worked as a staff attorney for the State University of New York--Central
Administration, was a law clerk to the late Chief Judge Alfred P. Murrah of the
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, and served as a faculty member
for the Federal Judicial Center in Washington, D.C. (the training arm of the United
States Courts).
Identified by the New York Times as an "authority on academic ethics," Gary Pavela
is a member of the Advisory Board of the Kenan Ethics Institute at Duke University
and is a past President of the National Center for Academic Integrity, a consortium
of 200 universities that collaborate on academic integrity policies and procedures.
He has been a consultant on legal issues and student conduct policies at many
leading universities, including Stanford University, the University of Michigan, The
University of California at San Diego, The University of North Carolina at Chapel
Hill, Rutgers University, Georgetown University, The United States Naval Academy,
Lehigh University, Brown University, Colgate University, and Smith College.
Gary Pavela is a NASPA "Pillar of the Profession." In 1995 he was awarded the
American College Personnel Association "Tracy R. Teele Memorial Award" for
"contributions to the area of judicial affairs and legal issues." In 1996 he
received the "D. Parker Young Award" for "outstanding scholarly and research
contributions in the area of higher education law and judicial affairs" from the
Association for Student Judicial Affairs. In 1999 he was awarded the "Thomas S.
Biggs Award" for "dedicated legal service" in the field of law and higher education;
presented at the Twentieth Annual National Conference on Law and Higher Education.
Last year Gary Pavela was designated the year 2002 "Fellow" of the National
Association of College and University Attorneys. Fellows of the Association are
identified by NACUA as individuals who have "brought distinction to higher education
and to the practice of law on behalf of colleges and universities across the
nation."
Andrew Canter is a recent graduate of the University of Maryland, College Park,
receiving a B.A. in Government & Politics with a minor in Music Performance. A
member of the University Honors Program, Mr. Canter was Chair of the Student
Honor Council, overseeing campus-wide academic integrity issues and ethical
development programming, including implementation of the University's new Honor
Pledge. Additionally, he was appointed to serve as the student member of the
University System of Maryland's Board of Regents. Mr. Canter is currently
pursuing a Master's Degree in Public Policy through the Coro Fellows Program in
Public Affairs.